T.M.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T.M.R. v. State

446 So. 2d 126, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27767

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1983·No. No. 82-1382·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed. However, that portion of the trial court’s order assessing the appellant court costs in the amount of $75.00 is stricken because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 445 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed. However, that portion of the trial court’s order assessing the appellant court costs in the amount of $75.00 is stricken because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 445 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

T.M.R. v. State, 446 So. 2d 126, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27767 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

446 So. 2d 126 (T.M.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related