T.M.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T.M.R. v. State

446 So. 2d 126, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27767

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1382

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 446 So. 2d 126 (T.M.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T.M.R. v. State, 446 So. 2d 126, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27767 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed. However, that portion of the trial court’s order assessing the appellant court costs in the amount of $75.00 is stricken because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 445 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed. However, that portion of the trial court’s order assessing the appellant court costs in the amount of $75.00 is stricken because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 445 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 So. 2d 126, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tmr-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack