T.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T.M. v. State

570 So. 2d 1129, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9282, 1990 WL 198306

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1990·No. No. 89-2710·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency is affirmed upon a determination that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest T.M. for trespass at the Westview Junior High School. This being true, the officer could lawfully conduct a search incident to the arrest. “The validity of a search of a defendant conducted after probable cause to arrest him has arisen is unaffected by the fact that the search comes before the arrest.” State v. James, 526 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); accord State v. Smith, 529 So.2d 1226 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); Acosta v. State, 431 So.2d 715 (Fla.3d DCA 1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency is affirmed upon a determination that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest T.M. for trespass at the Westview Junior High School. This being true, the officer could lawfully conduct a search incident to the arrest. “The validity of a search of a defendant conducted after probable cause to arrest him has arisen is unaffected by the fact that the search comes before the arrest.” State v. James, 526 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); accord State v. Smith, 529 So.2d 1226 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); Acosta v. State, 431 So.2d 715 (Fla.3d DCA 1983).

Affirmed.

T.M. v. State, 570 So. 2d 1129, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9282, 1990 WL 198306 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

570 So. 2d 1129 (T.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related