T.L.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T.L.D. v. State

266 So. 3d 881

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 2019

DocketCase No. 5D18-1315

StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 3d 881 (T.L.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T.L.D. v. State, 266 So. 3d 881 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten").

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten").

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 So. 3d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tld-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack