T.L.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T.L.D. v. State

266 So. 3d 881

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 2019·No. Case No. 5D18-1315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten").

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten").

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

T.L.D. v. State, 266 So. 3d 881 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

266 So. 3d 881 (T.L.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related