T.L. v. State

672 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924, 1996 WL 179883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in T.L. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1996·No. No. 95-1614·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a thorough review of the briefs and record, we have found no reversible error in the trial court’s decision that appellant should be adjudicated delinquent as a result of his commission of several offenses. However, appellant contends, and the state concedes, that the Juvenile Disposition Order erroneously recites that he pled no contest to all fifteen offenses that were charged. Instead, appellant was tried and found guilty in an adjudicatory hearing of twelve of these offenses. The trial court found appellant not guilty of the offenses charged in Counts I, III and IV. Upon remand, the Juvenile Disposition Order shall be corrected accordingly.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for modification of the Disposition Order.

WOLF, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

T.L. v. State, 672 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924, 1996 WL 179883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

672 So. 2d 65 (T.L. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.