T.L. James & Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development

Supreme Court of Louisiana

T.L. James & Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development

699 So. 2d 387, 1997 La. LEXIS 2459, 1997 WL 553186

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 15, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-2109

StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 387 (T.L. James & Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T.L. James & Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 699 So. 2d 387, 1997 La. LEXIS 2459, 1997 WL 553186 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re T.L. James & Company, Inc.;— Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 1532; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 438,271.

Writ granted; stay denied. Case remanded to the court of appeal for immediate consideration on the merits pursuant to its supervisory jurisdiction. Relator may re-apply for a stay if the court of appeal does not act prior to the award of the contract or in the event of an adverse judgment in the court of appeal.

CALOGERO, C.J., and JOHNSON and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the stay and the wilt. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re T.L. James & Company, Inc.;— Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 1532; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 438,271.

Writ granted; stay denied. Case remanded to the court of appeal for immediate consideration on the merits pursuant to its supervisory jurisdiction. Relator may re-apply for a stay if the court of appeal does not act prior to the award of the contract or in the event of an adverse judgment in the court of appeal.

CALOGERO, C.J., and JOHNSON and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the stay and the wilt. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 So. 2d 387, 1997 La. LEXIS 2459, 1997 WL 553186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tl-james-co-v-louisiana-department-of-transportation-development-la-1997.