T.K.O. v. State
This text of T.K.O. v. State (T.K.O. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
T.K.O., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4154 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)
Opinion filed December 6, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara T. Thomas, Judge.
Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
C. Todd Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
T.K.O. appeals the disposition order finding that he committed the
delinquent acts of trespass in an unoccupied conveyance and resisting an officer
without violence. The State has appropriately conceded that the evidence was legally
insufficient to support the trespass offense, as the evidence failed to establish that
T.K.O. knew or should have known that the car from which he was seen fleeing was stolen. See E.A.B. v. State, 851 So. 2d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); P.W. v. State,
730 So. 2d 422, 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). We therefore reverse the trial court's finding
that T.K.O. committed that delinquent act and remand for the court to amend the
disposition order accordingly. The court's order is affirmed in all other respects.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
T.K.O. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tko-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.