Tizzard v. Fay & Conkey

18 N.W. 869, 63 Iowa 213
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 9, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.W. 869 (Tizzard v. Fay & Conkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tizzard v. Fay & Conkey, 18 N.W. 869, 63 Iowa 213 (iowa 1884).

Opinion

Rothrock, Ch. J.

The appellant has not made and filed an assignment of errors. The appellee claims that the cause should be dismised for this reason. The claim is well founded. We cannot entertain the appeal unless errors are assigned. Code, § § 3183, 3207.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.W. 869, 63 Iowa 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tizzard-v-fay-conkey-iowa-1884.