Titus v. Wallick

Supreme Court

Titus v. Wallick

305 U.S. 585, 59 S. Ct. 80

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Titus v. Wallick. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 U.S. 282 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1938·No. No. 188·Published

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio granted. Motion to print an abbreviated record, consisting of the parts of the record filed in this cause which [586]*586are designated in the motion, granted, with leave to the respondent to submit to the Court a motion designating any additional portions of the record which he desires to have printed and the Court will take this motion under advisement.

Messrs. Aaron Frank and Thomas I. Sheridan for petitioner. Mr. Rolland M. Edmonds for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio granted. Motion to print an abbreviated record, consisting of the parts of the record filed in this cause which [586]*586are designated in the motion, granted, with leave to the respondent to submit to the Court a motion designating any additional portions of the record which he desires to have printed and the Court will take this motion under advisement.

Messrs. Aaron Frank and Thomas I. Sheridan for petitioner. Mr. Rolland M. Edmonds for respondent.

Titus v. Wallick, 305 U.S. 585, 59 S. Ct. 80 (1938).

Pincite

305 U.S. 585 (Titus v. Wallick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.