Titus v. Wallick
168 A. 453, 114 N.J. Eq. 171, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 895
Opinion
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Titus v. Wallick, 168 A. 453, 114 N.J. Eq. 171, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 895 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 453 (Titus v. Wallick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Hammerle v. Director, Division of Taxation
22 N.J. Tax 342 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2005)
Boysun v. Boysun
368 P.2d 439 (Montana Supreme Court, 1962)
Rogo v. Mahwah Realty Co.
120 A.2d 433 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
Westcott v. Konstantynowicz
51 A.2d 6 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Antonucci v. Gravina
34 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Farley
13 A.2d 313 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)