Titus v. Shaffer
110 A.D.2d 772, 488 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48672
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Petitioner’s conviction for petit larceny and his false answer to question 18 on his renewal application supported the determination to revoke petitioner’s license (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We find no merit to petitioner’s various other contentions. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Titus v. Shaffer, 110 A.D.2d 772, 488 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 772 (Titus v. Shaffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hughes v. Shaffer
154 A.D.2d 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)