Titus v. Poland Coal Co.
106 A. 90, 263 Pa. 24, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 370
Opinion
In the opinion filed by the learned president judge discharging the rule for judgment non obstante, the question raised by this 'appeal was carefully considered and correctly adjudged. Nothing can profitably be added to what is there said.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed on the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Titus v. Poland Coal Co., 106 A. 90, 263 Pa. 24, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 370 (Pa. 1919).
106 A. 90 (Titus v. Poland Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Remmett v. Smith
61 Pa. D. & C. 635 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Blackburn v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co.
168 A. 351 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Stein v. Bell Telephone Co.
151 A. 690 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Bricker v. Kline
86 Pa. Super. 594 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Stoever v. Gowen
124 A. 684 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Titus v. Poland Coal Co.
119 A. 540 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Dobkin v. Landsberg
116 A. 814 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Friedline v. Hoffman
115 A. 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)