Titus v. McGloskey

63 A. 244, 67 N.J. Eq. 709, 1 Robb. 709, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 219
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 9, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 A. 244 (Titus v. McGloskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Titus v. McGloskey, 63 A. 244, 67 N.J. Eq. 709, 1 Robb. 709, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 219 (N.J. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from in the above cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Dixón, Garrison, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray — 10.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Mrs. M
181 A.2d 14 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A. 244, 67 N.J. Eq. 709, 1 Robb. 709, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/titus-v-mcgloskey-nj-1904.