Tittle v. Jefferson County Commission

Eleventh Circuit

Tittle v. Jefferson County Commission

986 F.2d 1384

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tittle v. Jefferson County Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 F.3d 1535 →

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 16, 1993·No. No. 91-7054·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion July 14, 1992, 11th Cir., 1992, 966 F.2d 606)

Before UOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause, 966 F.2d 606, shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion July 14, 1992, 11th Cir., 1992, 966 F.2d 606)

Before UOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause, 966 F.2d 606, shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Tittle v. Jefferson County Commission, 986 F.2d 1384 (11th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

986 F.2d 1384 (Tittle v. Jefferson County Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.