TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v. City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of the City of Austin And Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in Their Official and Individual Capacities

Court of Appeals of Texas

TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v. City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of the City of Austin And Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in Their Official and Individual Capacities

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 11, 2022·No. 01-20-00071-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-20-00071-CV Trial Court Cause Number: D-1-GN-19-002613 Style: TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of The City of Austin; and Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in their Official and Individual Capacities Date motion filed*: 12/17/21 Type of motion: Motion for Rehearing Party filing motion: Appellees Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Guerra

Date: January 11, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-20-00071-CV Trial Court Cause Number: D-1-GN-19-002613 Style: TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of The City of Austin; and Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in their Official and Individual Capacities Date motion filed*: 12/17/21 Type of motion: Motion for Rehearing Party filing motion: Appellees Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Guerra

Date: January 11, 2022

TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v. City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of the City of Austin And Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in Their Official and Individual Capacities, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v. City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of the City of Austin And Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in Their Official and Individual Capacities (TitleMax of Texas, Inc. v. City of Austin and Anne Morgan, City Attorney of the City of Austin And Rondella Hawkins, Officer, City of Austin Office of Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs, in Their Official and Individual Capacities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.