Title & Reseajrch Group, Inc. v. Dyer
643 So. 2d 28, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8838, 1994 WL 486592
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1994·No. No. 93-2287·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse and remand with directions for entry of judgment in favor of appellant. The record demonstrates that no proof was presented at trial that the appellees were actually damaged by their lack of knowledge of the lis pendens filed in the foreclosure action by the first mortgagee. See Interstate Title Corp. v. Miller, 581 So.2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); CMEI, Inc. v. American Title Ins. Co., 447 So.2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Goode v. Federal Title and Ins. Corp., 162 So.2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Title & Reseajrch Group, Inc. v. Dyer, 643 So. 2d 28, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8838, 1994 WL 486592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
643 So. 2d 28 (Title & Reseajrch Group, Inc. v. Dyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brower v. Hubbard
643 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)