Title Insurance v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert & Pahl

467 S.E.2d 241, 342 N.C. 887, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 136
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 8, 1996·No. No. 366A95·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the sole issue brought forward on appeal by the dissent in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the court by Judge Lewis is affirmed except that the following sentence in the opinion is dis[888] avowed and stricken: “We agree that plaintiff suffered no actual damages until it cancelled the deed of trust, which it did while the jury deliberated.” Title Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert and Pahl, 119 N.C. App. 608, 611, 459 S.E.2d 801, 804 (1995). As to the additional issues raised in the petitions for discretionary review, discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Title Insurance v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert & Pahl, 467 S.E.2d 241, 342 N.C. 887, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 136 (N.C. 1996).

467 S.E.2d 241 (Title Insurance v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert & Pahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Fox
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
Piraino Bros. v. Atlantic Financial Group, Inc.
712 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.
580 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Nick v. Baker
481 S.E.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)