Title Insurance v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert & Pahl
This text of 467 S.E.2d 241 (Title Insurance v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert & Pahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to the sole issue brought forward on appeal by the dissent in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the court by Judge Lewis is affirmed except that the following sentence in the opinion is dis[888]*888avowed and stricken: “We agree that plaintiff suffered no actual damages until it cancelled the deed of trust, which it did while the jury deliberated.” Title Ins. Co. of Minn. v. Smith, Debnam, Hibbert and Pahl, 119 N.C. App. 608, 611, 459 S.E.2d 801, 804 (1995). As to the additional issues raised in the petitions for discretionary review, discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 S.E.2d 241, 342 N.C. 887, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/title-insurance-v-smith-debnam-hibbert-pahl-nc-1996.