Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Dutcher

203 F. 169, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1723
District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 7, 1913·No. No. 1,832·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

The controlling facts in this case are the same as those in the ease of Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. William Dutcher et al., 203 Fed. 167, being cause No. 1,861, this day determined, which is held to be decisive of the present case.

The only difference to be noted is that in this case the contractor had been paid almost half of the contract price, after the assignment by him, as security for money borrowed, of a part of the city’s bonds, and, further, that in the present case, there will be no balance in the hands of the city after paying the complainant the amounts expended by it in completing the contract and paying the labor and materialmen’s claims.

Findings and decree will be prepared in accordance with this, and the decision in case No. 1,861.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Dutcher, 203 F. 169, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1723 (W.D. Wash. 1913).

203 F. 169 (Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Dutcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Argonaut Insurance v. C & S Bank of Tifton
232 S.E.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Fulton National Bank v. Fulton County
87 S.E. 1023 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)