Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Spur Amusement Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Spur Amusement Corp.

254 A.D. 907, 5 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8260

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 907 (Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Spur Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Spur Amusement Corp., 254 A.D. 907, 5 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

-Appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale which provides, in connection with the premises concededly within the lien of the mortgage, for the sale of “ all the personal property * * * used in connection with the theatre thereon, with the exception of the talking equipment providing such talking equipment is not owned by defendant Spur Amusement Corporation * * The sole issue was whether or not the lien of the mortgage extends to the personal property used in the operation of the theatre. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. We are of opinion that the mortgage itself sufficiently evidences the intention of the parties to have included within its lien the after-acquired personalty consisting of theatre equipment. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-Appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale which provides, in connection with the premises concededly within the lien of the mortgage, for the sale of “ all the personal property * * * used in connection with the theatre thereon, with the exception of the talking equipment providing such talking equipment is not owned by defendant Spur Amusement Corporation * * The sole issue was whether or not the lien of the mortgage extends to the personal property used in the operation of the theatre. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. We are of opinion that the mortgage itself sufficiently evidences the intention of the parties to have included within its lien the after-acquired personalty consisting of theatre equipment. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 907, 5 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/title-guarantee-trust-co-v-spur-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1938.