Titilation Designs Ltd. v. Cambridge Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Titilation Designs Ltd. v. Cambridge Mutual Insurance

72 A.D.2d 548, 420 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13610

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.2d 548 (Titilation Designs Ltd. v. Cambridge Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Titilation Designs Ltd. v. Cambridge Mutual Insurance, 72 A.D.2d 548, 420 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action on a fire insurance policy, [549]*549defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 3, 1979, as directed that it produce certain documents for discovery and inspection. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The discovery shall proceed in the place designated in the order under review, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term properly exercised its discretion. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mengano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on a fire insurance policy, [549]*549defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 3, 1979, as directed that it produce certain documents for discovery and inspection. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The discovery shall proceed in the place designated in the order under review, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term properly exercised its discretion. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mengano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.2d 548, 420 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/titilation-designs-ltd-v-cambridge-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1979.