Titel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Titel v. State

847 So. 2d 1130, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9417, 2003 WL 21458692

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Titel v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14791 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2003·No. No. 4D01-3575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for kidnapping and sexual battery. Appellant also asks to be sentenced for the sexual battery conviction, as the parties agree that the trial court vacated Appellant’s initial sentence on that conviction but never resentenced him. We therefore remand [1131]*1131for imposition of sentence on the sexual battery conviction.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for imposition of sentence.

GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for kidnapping and sexual battery. Appellant also asks to be sentenced for the sexual battery conviction, as the parties agree that the trial court vacated Appellant’s initial sentence on that conviction but never resentenced him. We therefore remand [1131]*1131for imposition of sentence on the sexual battery conviction.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for imposition of sentence.

GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Titel v. State, 847 So. 2d 1130, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9417, 2003 WL 21458692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

847 So. 2d 1130 (Titel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.