Titeflex Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance
This text of Titeflex Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance (Titeflex Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE : No. 283 EAL 2014 COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, : THOMAS WAGNER AND THOMAS F. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the WAGNER, INC. : Order of the Superior Court : : v. : : : TITEFLEX CORPORATION : : : PETITION OF: NATIONAL UNION FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY OF : PITTSBURGH, PA : : : : : : : :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is DENIED. The Application Pursuant [to] Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate
Procedure 2051(a) Respecting Supplemental Authorities is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Titeflex Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/titeflex-corp-v-national-union-fire-insurance-pa-2014.