Titcomb v. Wyant

Supreme Court of Virginia

Titcomb v. Wyant

323 S.E.2d 800

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedDecember 14, 1984

DocketRecord No. 831906

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 323 S.E.2d 800 (Titcomb v. Wyant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Titcomb v. Wyant, 323 S.E.2d 800 (Va. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

323 S.E.2d 800 (1984)

Kenneth L. TITCOMB, Appellant,
v.
Judy WYANT, Superintendent, Haymarket Bureau of Corrections, Appellee.

Record No. 831906.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

December 14, 1984.

R. Randolph Willoughby, Manassas, for appellant.

Gerald L. Baliles, Atty. Gen., Linwood T. Wells, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

On November 5, 1984, came the appellant, by counsel, and filed copies of notices of appeal to the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals from a judgment rendered against him on October 24, 1984, by the Circuit Court of Prince William County, wherein that court denied appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

On consideration whereof, the Court holds that exclusive jurisdiction over this appeal lies with the Court of Appeals, pursuant to Code §§ 17-116.04 and 17-116.05:4.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the notice of appeal to the Supreme Court be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Because the question of jurisdiction over appeals from habeas corpus determinations in the circuit courts is likely to arise in future cases, it is further ordered that a copy of this order be published in the Virginia Reports.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

323 S.E.2d 800 (1984)

Kenneth L. TITCOMB, Appellant,
v.
Judy WYANT, Superintendent, Haymarket Bureau of Corrections, Appellee.

Record No. 831906.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

December 14, 1984.

R. Randolph Willoughby, Manassas, for appellant.

Gerald L. Baliles, Atty. Gen., Linwood T. Wells, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

On November 5, 1984, came the appellant, by counsel, and filed copies of notices of appeal to the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals from a judgment rendered against him on October 24, 1984, by the Circuit Court of Prince William County, wherein that court denied appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

On consideration whereof, the Court holds that exclusive jurisdiction over this appeal lies with the Court of Appeals, pursuant to Code §§ 17-116.04 and 17-116.05:4.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the notice of appeal to the Supreme Court be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Because the question of jurisdiction over appeals from habeas corpus determinations in the circuit courts is likely to arise in future cases, it is further ordered that a copy of this order be published in the Virginia Reports.

Joseph Roger O'dell, III v. J.D. Netherland, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia, Joseph Roger O'dell, III v. J.D. Netherland, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia

95 F.3d 1214 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)

O'Dell v. Netherland

95 F.3d 1214 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)

Derick Lynn Peterson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

904 F.2d 882 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Hill v. Commonwealth

379 S.E.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1989)

Peterson v. Bass

343 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1986)

White v. Garraghty

341 S.E.2d 402 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1986)