Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.
266 So. 2d 446, 262 La. 1166, 1972 La. LEXIS 5252
Opinions
I am of the opinion the writ should be granted solely for the reason that the Court of Appeal failed to find facts upon which its opinion is based. See Dick v. Phillips, 253 La. 366, 218 So.2d 299 (1969). In my view, based upon the reasons assigned by the trial court, the judgment complained of is correct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co., 266 So. 2d 446, 262 La. 1166, 1972 La. LEXIS 5252 (La. 1972).
266 So. 2d 446 (Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company
291 So. 2d 857 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company
282 So. 2d 474 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)