Titan Corrugated, Inc. v. Maxx Electric, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 11, 2011·No. 02-11-00257-CV·Published

Opinion

02-11-257-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00257-CV

Titan Corrugated, Inc.

APPELLANT

V.

Maxx Electric, Inc.

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 211th District Court OF Denton COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion is not opposed.  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

          Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  August 11, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Titan Corrugated, Inc. v. Maxx Electric, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Titan Corrugated, Inc. v. Maxx Electric, Inc. (Titan Corrugated, Inc. v. Maxx Electric, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.