Tison v. A. C. L. R. R. Co.

137 So. 388, 102 Fla. 1060
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 388 (Tison v. A. C. L. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tison v. A. C. L. R. R. Co., 137 So. 388, 102 Fla. 1060 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, While Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. *Page 1061 McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 388, 102 Fla. 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tison-v-a-c-l-r-r-co-fla-1931.