Tishman v. Singer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tishman v. Singer

537 So. 2d 718, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 504, 1989 WL 9139

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1989

DocketNo. 87-3055

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 718 (Tishman v. Singer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tishman v. Singer, 537 So. 2d 718, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 504, 1989 WL 9139 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment entered as to Count I and II, but decline to consider Count IV. The order directed to Count IV is not appealable per Rule 9.130 or Rule 9.030, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc., v. Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Paint v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co., 208 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Consideration of all of the issues and arguments raised by appellant establishes that there are no genuine issues of fact left to be resolved and that the lower court correctly resolved Counts I and II.

AFFIRMED as to Counts I and II, and DISMISSED as to Count IV.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment entered as to Count I and II, but decline to consider Count IV. The order directed to Count IV is not appealable per Rule 9.130 or Rule 9.030, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc., v. Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Paint v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co., 208 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Consideration of all of the issues and arguments raised by appellant establishes that there are no genuine issues of fact left to be resolved and that the lower court correctly resolved Counts I and II.

AFFIRMED as to Counts I and II, and DISMISSED as to Count IV.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 718, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 504, 1989 WL 9139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tishman-v-singer-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack