Tishman Speyer-Equitable South Florida Venture v. Knight Investments Inc.
517 So. 2d 100, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 90, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11688
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 1987
DocketNos. 4-86-2861, 4-86-2989
StatusPublished
This text of 517 So. 2d 100 (Tishman Speyer-Equitable South Florida Venture v. Knight Investments Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tishman Speyer-Equitable South Florida Venture v. Knight Investments Inc., 517 So. 2d 100, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 90, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
We reverse the summary final judgment entered by the trial court because we find, contrary to the conclusion of the trial court, that the contract provisions in dispute are sufficiently ambiguous to permit the introduction of parol evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
517 So. 2d 100, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 90, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tishman-speyer-equitable-south-florida-venture-v-knight-investments-inc-fladistctapp-1987.