Tisdol v. State

823 So. 2d 300, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583, 2002 WL 1842722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3439·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 685 So.2d 912 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)(“[W]here, as here, a defendant raises an issue under Rule 3.800, the lower court denies relief and the defendant fails to appeal, he may not later raise the same issue in another Rule 3.800 motion”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tisdol v. State, 823 So. 2d 300, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583, 2002 WL 1842722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

823 So. 2d 300 (Tisdol v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. State
69 So. 3d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. McBride
848 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)