Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tisdale v. State

Tisdale v. State

140 So. 3d 652, 2014 WL 1921662, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7132
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2014
DocketNo. 3D14-219
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 652 (Tisdale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tisdale v. State, 140 So. 3d 652, 2014 WL 1921662, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7132 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Baxter Tisdale seeks a belated appeal of his conviction and sentence. We conclude that Tisdale’s petition is facially insufficient. Tisdale has failed to show that he is entitled to receive a belated appeal because he has not specifically alleged that he timely requested counsel to file an appeal or even advised trial counsel that an appeal had been filed, so that trial counsel could file a motion for appointment of appellate counsel. Therefore, the petition is denied without prejudice to Tisdale filing a facially sufficient petition. State v. Trowell, 739 So.2d 77 (Fla.1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Trowell
739 So. 2d 77 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 3d 652, 2014 WL 1921662, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tisdale-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.