Tisdale v. Obama

473 F. App'x 203
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1124
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 203 (Tisdale v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tisdale v. Obama, 473 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Tisdale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and motion for an injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tisdale v. Obama, No. 3:12-cv-00036-JAG (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2012). We deny Tisdale’s motions to expedite the appeal and for an injunction, and to recuse Judges Davis, Keenan, Wynn, Diaz, and Floyd. We grant the motion to file an amicus curiae brief and file it out of time. We deny all other pending motions filed by Tisdale. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tisdale-v-obama-ca4-2012.