Tischman v. Erie Railroad

85 A. 1135, 83 N.J.L. 793, 54 Vroom 793, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 238
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 18, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A. 1135 (Tischman v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tischman v. Erie Railroad, 85 A. 1135, 83 N.J.L. 793, 54 Vroom 793, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reásons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenehard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Bogert, Congdon, White, Teeacy, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A. 1135, 83 N.J.L. 793, 54 Vroom 793, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tischman-v-erie-railroad-nj-1912.