Tischkowsky v. Fischer

159 N.Y.S. 1145

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 1145 (Tischkowsky v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tischkowsky v. Fischer, 159 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

The plaintiff testified in substance that a paroi agreement was made between defendant and himself whereunder the defendant engaged the plaintiff at $100 a week ns a performer, and that plaintiff was to pay the defendant, out of that $100 a week, $25. Immediately thereafter the parties signed a written agreement, under which the plaintiff appointed the defendant his manager to secure him employment as an artist, and plaintiff agreed to pay the defendant $25 a week for each week during which plaintiff might be engaged to perform at the rate of $100 per week. It is immaterial whether we regard the alleged paroi agreement testified to by plaintiff as merely a negotiation which became merged into the written agreement, or whether the written agreement be given its appropriate weight as totally disproving the extraordinary and incredible contention of the plaintiff as to the character of the contract entered into between the parties. In either event, the judgment-must be reversed, with $30 costs, and, as it is [1146]*1146perfectly clear that plaintiff has developed all the facts bearing, upon the controversy, the complaint will be dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tischkowsky-v-fischer-nyappdiv-1916.