Tisby v. State

638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 908, 1994 WL 245689
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1994
DocketNo. 81676
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 638 So. 2d 56 (Tisby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tisby v. State, 638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 908, 1994 WL 245689 (Fla. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Tisby v. State, 614 So.2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on constitutional construction. We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved the issue presented in this ease in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalf we quash the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, Senior Justice, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamon v. State
744 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 908, 1994 WL 245689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tisby-v-state-fla-1994.