Tisby v. State

638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 908, 1994 WL 245689
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 9, 1994·No. No. 81676·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Tisby v. State, 614 So.2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on constitutional construction. We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved the issue presented in this ease in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalf we quash the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, Senior Justice, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tisby v. State, 638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 908, 1994 WL 245689 (Fla. 1994).

638 So. 2d 56 (Tisby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamon v. State
744 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)