Tirelli v. Bicknell

308 A.D.2d 579, 764 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9871
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant Bender & Bodnar, sued herein as Bender & Bender, Esqs., and the nonparty Development Strategies, LLC, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered April 11, 2002, which denied their motion to set aside the foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The motion of the defendant Bender & Bodnar, sued herein as Bender & Bender, Esqs., and the nonparty Development Strategies, LLC, to set aside the foreclosure sale was properly denied on the ground of laches (see Amsterdam Sav. Bank v City View Mgt. Corp., 45 NY2d 854 [1978]; First Nationwide Bank v Calano, 223 AD2d 524, 525 [1996]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are academic. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tirelli v. Bicknell, 308 A.D.2d 579, 764 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

308 A.D.2d 579 (Tirelli v. Bicknell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson City Sav. Bank v. Hossain
2020 NY Slip Op 1481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)