Tiran Casteel v. Bill McCarthy

392 F. App'x 506
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 7, 2010
Docket10-2075
StatusUnpublished

This text of 392 F. App'x 506 (Tiran Casteel v. Bill McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tiran Casteel v. Bill McCarthy, 392 F. App'x 506 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tiran Casteel appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging numerous *507 constitutional violations. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (to prevail on Eighth Amendment claim, prisoner is required to show that challenged condition presented substantial risk of serious harm and that prison officials acted with deliberate indifference toward that risk); see also Shade v. City of Farmington, 309 F.3d 1054, 1058 n. 6 (8th Cir.2002) (arguments not briefed are considered abandoned on appeal).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 F. App'x 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiran-casteel-v-bill-mccarthy-ca8-2010.