Tirado v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tirado v. City of New York

200 A.D.2d 383, 608 N.Y.S.2d 80

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 383 (Tirado v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tirado v. City of New York, 200 A.D.2d 383, 608 N.Y.S.2d 80 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered February 2, 1993, which after a traverse hearing, granted plaintiffs motion for entry of a default judgment against defendant Roy Lewis and directed an assessment of damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff met her burden of demonstrating by a fair preponderance of the evidence that defendant Roy Lewis had been properly served with the summons and complaint (see, Blue Spot v Superior Mdse. Elecs. Co., 150 AD2d 175, 176-177). The court was clearly warranted in concluding that the testimony of the process server was credible while that of defendant’s wife was not. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered February 2, 1993, which after a traverse hearing, granted plaintiffs motion for entry of a default judgment against defendant Roy Lewis and directed an assessment of damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff met her burden of demonstrating by a fair preponderance of the evidence that defendant Roy Lewis had been properly served with the summons and complaint (see, Blue Spot v Superior Mdse. Elecs. Co., 150 AD2d 175, 176-177). The court was clearly warranted in concluding that the testimony of the process server was credible while that of defendant’s wife was not. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 383, 608 N.Y.S.2d 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tirado-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack