Tipton v. State

95 S.W.2d 397, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 755
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 10, 1936
DocketNo. 18475
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W.2d 397 (Tipton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tipton v. State, 95 S.W.2d 397, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 755 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.W.2d 397, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tipton-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.