Tipton v. Cummins

5 Blackf. 571, 1841 Ind. LEXIS 50

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1841·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THE amending of a declaration in debt by inserting the amount of damages claimed, does not entitle the defendant to a continuance.

The plaintiff cannot take a judgment by nil dicit, if the general issue be on file. Harris v. The M. M. Co., 4 Blackf. 267.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tipton v. Cummins, 5 Blackf. 571, 1841 Ind. LEXIS 50 (Ind. 1841).

Pincite

5 Blackf. 571 (Tipton v. Cummins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.