Tipton v. Cummins
5 Blackf. 571, 1841 Ind. LEXIS 50
This text of 5 Blackf. 571 (Tipton v. Cummins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tipton v. Cummins, 5 Blackf. 571, 1841 Ind. LEXIS 50 (Ind. 1841).
Opinion
THE amending of a declaration in debt by inserting the amount of damages claimed, does not entitle the defendant to a continuance.
The plaintiff cannot take a judgment by nil dicit, if the general issue be on file. Harris v. The M. M. Co., 4 Blackf. 267.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Webb v. Thompson
23 Ind. 428 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
Epperly v. Little
6 Ind. 344 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1855)
Young v. State Bank
4 Ind. 301 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 571, 1841 Ind. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tipton-v-cummins-ind-1841.