Tippins v. De Loach

9 Ga. App. 362
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1911
Docket2992
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 Ga. App. 362 (Tippins v. De Loach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tippins v. De Loach, 9 Ga. App. 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The judgment of the superior court, dismissing the certiorari because the certiorari bond did not show on its face, or by any other written evidence, that it had been approved by the judicial officer before whom the case was tried in the first instance, is fully controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Dykes v. Twiggs County, 115 Ga. 698 (42 S. E. 36), and the decisions therein cited. The approval of the bond by the clerk of the court is not such an approval as the law requires. Where the application for the writ of certiorari is not applied for in forma pauperis, the plaintiff must file with his petition, with the clerk of the superior court, a bond, as required by the Civil Code (1910), § 5185, approved in writing by the judicial officer or officers whose judgment it is sought to review; otherwise, the clerk has no authority of law to issue the writ of certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Rawlings. October 6, 1910. H. II. Elders, for- plaintiff in error. E. C. Collins, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Oxford
124 S.E.2d 420 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Veal v. Eagle Fire Insurance
120 S.E.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Thoms v. John R. Thompson Co.
145 S.E. 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Sanford v. Wade
86 S.E. 945 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Ga. App. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tippins-v-de-loach-gactapp-1911.