Tippett v. McCrady-Rodgers Co.

177 F.2d 375
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 27, 1949
DocketNo. 9954
StatusPublished

This text of 177 F.2d 375 (Tippett v. McCrady-Rodgers Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tippett v. McCrady-Rodgers Co., 177 F.2d 375 (3d Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our own examination of the record reveals neither substantial error in the •Court’s charge as to damages or that the verdict in favor of the plaintiff is grossly inadequate.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F.2d 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tippett-v-mccrady-rodgers-co-ca3-1949.