Tipper v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Tipper v. Ritchie

53 N.W. 547, 51 Minn. 253, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 58

DecidedNovember 11, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 53 N.W. 547 (Tipper v. Ritchie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tipper v. Ritchie, 53 N.W. 547, 51 Minn. 253, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 58 (Mich. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented upon a trial in the court below without a jury findings of fact were made, and judgment ordered in plaintiff’s favor for the amount in controversy. The alleged error on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the findings. The evidence was not very clear, and, perhaps, not very convincing, but from an examination we are of the opinion that there was enough to justify the findings of fact as made by the trial, trial court.

Order refusing a new trial affirmed.

{Opinion published 53 N. W. Rep. 547.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented upon a trial in the court below without a jury findings of fact were made, and judgment ordered in plaintiff’s favor for the amount in controversy. The alleged error on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the findings. The evidence was not very clear, and, perhaps, not very convincing, but from an examination we are of the opinion that there was enough to justify the findings of fact as made by the trial, trial court.

Order refusing a new trial affirmed.

{Opinion published 53 N. W. Rep. 547.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 N.W. 547, 51 Minn. 253, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tipper-v-ritchie-minn-1892.