Tiplin v. Baylis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tiplin v. Baylis

235 A.D. 734

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 734 (Tiplin v. Baylis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tiplin v. Baylis, 235 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. In our opinion, the plaintiff failed to establish his claim that the tax deed to Hubbard of parcel 57 includes any of plaintiff’s land. At all events it cannot be said that the findings of the trial court on this question are against the weight of the evidence. We think, however, that the eleventh finding of fact should be struck out and a new finding made to the effect that the tax deeds held by defendant Hubbard do not include any part of plaintiff’s land. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. In our opinion, the plaintiff failed to establish his claim that the tax deed to Hubbard of parcel 57 includes any of plaintiff’s land. At all events it cannot be said that the findings of the trial court on this question are against the weight of the evidence. We think, however, that the eleventh finding of fact should be struck out and a new finding made to the effect that the tax deeds held by defendant Hubbard do not include any part of plaintiff’s land. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiplin-v-baylis-nyappdiv-1932.