Tipa v. Magyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tipa v. Magyer

206 A.D.2d 469, 615 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7496

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 18, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 469 (Tipa v. Magyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tipa v. Magyer, 206 A.D.2d 469, 615 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants County of Suffolk and Helga Kroeber appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated October 28, 1992, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

We agree with the appellants’ contentions that the plaintiff has failed, as a matter of law, to raise a question of fact as to [470]*470any negligence on the part of the appellants. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants County of Suffolk and Helga Kroeber appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated October 28, 1992, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

We agree with the appellants’ contentions that the plaintiff has failed, as a matter of law, to raise a question of fact as to [470]*470any negligence on the part of the appellants. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 469, 615 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tipa-v-magyer-nyappdiv-1994.