Tio Jackson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 3, 2018
Docket10-17-00334-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Tio Jackson v. State (Tio Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tio Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00333-CR No. 10-17-00334-CR

TIO JACKSON, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 220th District Court Hamilton County, Texas Trial Court Nos. CR08282 and CR08283

ORDER

Although a party may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and

file in the appellate court a supplemental clerk’s record containing an omitted item, see

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1), the State has filed a motion to supplement the record in each of

these appeals with “twenty-one pages of documents on file with the district clerk in

Cause No. CR08283 in the 220th District Court of Hamilton[] County, Texas.” The State

has attached to its motion a copy of the twenty-one pages to be supplemented. In Appellate Court Cause No. 10-17-00333-CR (the appeal from Trial Court Cause

No. CR08282), the State’s motion to supplement the record is dismissed. According to

the State’s motion, the twenty-one pages of documents are not on file in Trial Court Cause

No. CR08282; therefore, the pages cannot have been “omitted from the clerk’s record” in

Appellate Court Cause No. 10-17-00333-CR. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

In Appellate Court Cause No. 10-17-00334-CR (the appeal from Trial Court Cause

No. CR08283), the State’s motion to supplement the record is granted. Within seven (7)

days of the date of this Order, the State is ordered to designate in writing for the trial

court clerk the specific twenty-one pages with which it would like the appellate record to

be supplemented. The State is further ordered to simultaneously notify this Court when

it has completed this task. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, the trial

court clerk is then directed to prepare, certify, and file in this Court a supplemental clerk’s

record containing the twenty-one pages of documents designated by the State.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed July 3, 2018

Jackson v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tio Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tio-jackson-v-state-texapp-2018.