Tintinger v. Tintinger
This text of Tintinger v. Tintinger (Tintinger v. Tintinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
03/01/2024
IN THE SUPkEIVIE COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 24-0068
DA 24-0068
ASHLEY LeANN TINTINGER,
Petitioner and Appellee,
and ORDER
SAMUEL VERNON TINTINGER,
Respondent and Appellant.
Pro Se Appellant Samuel Vernon Tintinger has filed a motion for extension of time to file his opening brief in this matter. The Court notes that The District Court record has not yet been transmitted to the Supreme Court. Pursuant to M. R. App. 13(1), an appellant shall have 30 days after the record is transmitted to file and serve the opening brief. Therefore, the motion for extension is premature. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extension of time is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this order to all counsel of record and to Samuel Vernon Tintinger. .S4- DATED this '— day of March, 2024. For the Court,
Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tintinger v. Tintinger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tintinger-v-tintinger-mont-2024.