Tinter v. Lucik, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2005)

2005 Ohio 5858
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 2005·No. No. 86026.·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Elizabeth M. Tinter, appeals from the trial court's judgment granting defendants-appellees' motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's case-in-chief. However, this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this appeal. The trial court has not yet made a disposition of defendants' counterclaim, which asserted a claim for breach of a noncompetition agreement. The trial court's journal entry does not certify its partial judgment as no just reason for delay pursuant to Civ.R. 54(B). Consequently, the trial court's judgment is not a final appealable order pursuant to Civ.R. 54(B).

Appeal dismissed.

It is ordered that appellees recover of appellant their costs herein taxed.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Cooney, J., and Corrigan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinter v. Lucik, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2005), 2005 Ohio 5858 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).

2005 Ohio 5858 (Tinter v. Lucik, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2005)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tinter v. Lucik
876 N.E.2d 1026 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)