Tinston v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tinston v. City of New York

18 A.D.2d 786, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4711

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tinston v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 A.D.2d 311 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1963·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Does the complaint herein state a cause of action?” Settle order on notice. Motion for an extension of time granted insofar as to extend the time for defendants-respondents to serve their answer to 10 days after service upon the attorneys for plaintiff-appellant of a copy of the order of the Court of Appeals determining defendants-respondents’ appeal. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Does the complaint herein state a cause of action?” Settle order on notice. Motion for an extension of time granted insofar as to extend the time for defendants-respondents to serve their answer to 10 days after service upon the attorneys for plaintiff-appellant of a copy of the order of the Court of Appeals determining defendants-respondents’ appeal. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Tinston v. City of New York, 18 A.D.2d 786, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

18 A.D.2d 786 (Tinston v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.