Tinsley v. United States Air Force

229 Ct. Cl. 705, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 625, 1981 WL 22108
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 18, 1981
DocketNo. 676-81C
StatusPublished

This text of 229 Ct. Cl. 705 (Tinsley v. United States Air Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinsley v. United States Air Force, 229 Ct. Cl. 705, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 625, 1981 WL 22108 (cc 1981).

Opinion

Military pay; disability pay; limitation of actions; accrual of cause of action. — On December 18,1981 the court entered the following order:

Before Kashiwa, Bennett, and Smith, Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff, pro se, pleads that during his service in the United States Air Force "HOSTILE AND HARSH TREATMENT FROM [his] SQUADRON SUPERIORS” caused him to suffer a mental breakdown. Plaintiff further pleads that because of his continuing illness he has been unable to support himself since leaving the military. A similar claim, filed previously in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 81-2525, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by memorandum order of that court dated October 27,1981.

A cause of action for military disability pay or compensation accrues as soon as the proper military board has acted or declined to act. Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 310 F.2d 381 (1962), cert. denied sub nom., Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963). Plaintiff has not pleaded that he has exhausted his administrative remedies before the relevant board or boards; therefore, there is no claim before the court.

it is therefore ordered that plaintiffs petition is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted by this court.

Plaintiffs petition for certiorari was denied March 8, 1982.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friedman v. United States
310 F.2d 381 (Court of Claims, 1962)
Lipp v. United States
373 U.S. 932 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 Ct. Cl. 705, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 625, 1981 WL 22108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinsley-v-united-states-air-force-cc-1981.