Tinsley v. Tinsley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tinsley v. Tinsley

123 So. 2d 682

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 1, 1960

DocketNo. 59-572

StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 2d 682 (Tinsley v. Tinsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tinsley v. Tinsley, 123 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on the 10th day of December, 1959 (116 So.2d 649) reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 5, 1960 (- So.2d -) quashed this court’s judgment of reversal; and

Whereas, by the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida now lodged in this court the cause was remanded with directions to enter an order consistent with said judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Therefore, it is Ordered that the judgment of this court filed December 10, 1959, is vacated and the several orders appealed are affirmed and the mandate of this court will now issue; costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on the 10th day of December, 1959 (116 So.2d 649) reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 5, 1960 (- So.2d -) quashed this court’s judgment of reversal; and

Whereas, by the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida now lodged in this court the cause was remanded with directions to enter an order consistent with said judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Therefore, it is Ordered that the judgment of this court filed December 10, 1959, is vacated and the several orders appealed are affirmed and the mandate of this court will now issue; costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 2d 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinsley-v-tinsley-fladistctapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack