Tinsley v. Harris

Fourth Circuit

Tinsley v. Harris

228 F. App'x 266

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2007·No. No. 06-7810·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Henry Tinsley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tinsley v. Harris, No. 2:05-cv-00730-JBF (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Henry Tinsley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tinsley v. Harris, No. 2:05-cv-00730-JBF (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tinsley v. Harris, 228 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

228 F. App'x 266 (Tinsley v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related